home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
mac
/
ILLUSION
/
SROCK_TX.CXT
/
00335_Text_ref16t.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
1KB
|
42 lines
A theory that can plausibly be
applied to the M├╝ller-Lyer
figure concerns eye
movements. The argument
initially was that perceived
extents are a function of the
distance required to move the
eyes from one end of the figure
to the other. Because of the
direction of the arrowheads, it
was argued that eye movements
would differ for the shaft
lengths that were actually
equal. No one believes this
general principle anymore, and
in fact the geometrical
illusions occur in exposures
much too brief to permit any
eye movement at all.
A more sophisticated theory
proposed about eye movement is
that perceived spatial
properties, such as the
separation (or extent) between
points and the orientation or
curvature of a contour, are a
function of what "commands" a
higher center in the brain
issues to the eye muscles.
(Information we obtain about
what the eyes are doing derives
not from proprioceptive
feedback from the eye muscles
but from a record of commands
to the eye muscles.) Leon
Festinger of the New School for
Social Research once
maintained that such eye
muscle commands determine
what we perceive.